When arguing with the average leftist moron, one has to realize their systematic resort to a kind of liturgic vocabulary ; these proclaimed atheists tend to debate in a way a TV-preacher would, with the same solemn tone and a cultivated art of indignation one would not expect even from a catholic maid. An example of their dogmatic distorsion of language is the ugly neologism « homophobe », one is labeled with every time he underlines the very « difference » most of fags are so proud of. As far as I am concerned, I do not care too much of what human beings are are doing of their genitals. What I oppose is the political weight that some are gaining rather than the way they choose to catch various diseases ; besides one need not smash what we dispise in order to be coherent - the second world war and the history of Israel have shown that this is rather a jewish habit. My point here is only to deal quickly with this strange accusation of « homophobia », and to show that those who practice it are mainly those who claim to oppose it.
One has not to learn ancient greek for years to understand that « homo » means approximately « the same » or « alike ». An homosexual is therefore, according to my dictionnary, « a person who feels attracted, exclusively or not, to individuals of his own gender ». Another french synonym, is « homophile », which means specifically « attracted to men ». Logically, an « homophobe » should be a male who feels disgust, fear or hate for his fellows - some avatar of « misanthrope ». Of course, this is not the meaning our enemies gave to this word, as one has to feel hate towards faggots alone to deserve such label. It can be pointed out that those very fags, like the aids-worshippers of Act-Up, have never been accused of « heterophobia », despite their pride in their perversity...
Let’s see this funny word from the etymological point : homo = the same ; phobe = who fears. I have shown what this would mean on the sexual « level ». If we transpose it to the cultural and national level, one obtains the following definition : « he who hates who or what looks like him ». The main reason the kosher pack invoke in their war against us is our conception of nationalism. As a nation is not defined by its geographical borders but by a community of history, culture and language on a specific territory, all of this combined with the indispensable will to be part of it, any individual claiming to oppose its promotion and defense displays clearly his repulsion for what his parents have given him in common with his fellow-citizens. He then rejects what is similar to him and becomes therefore homophobic.
The walking turds someone called « whiggers » are an excellent illustration of this idiosyncrasy : they seem unable to show pride in what they are genetically. They adopt the way of life of the worst street scum. They worship their balls beyond what they can do with them, crave to darken their skin, abuse of some jamaican drug, reject christianism for any kind of « eastern » philosophy, ignore resolutely the history of their people to merely study those of other races, show respect and love for every flag except theirs... Baudelaire wrote a poem called « Anywhere out of the world » : this self-hating trash squeaks : « Anyone but myself ! » It seems the very thought of their ancestry turns their stomachs upside down.
For centuries, in any part of this world, every biped felt naturally pride and care for what he was and whence he came. But not these astonishing animals, the result of degeneracy and a glimpse of the end of our civilization. Such violent rejection of everything that defines them betrays a profound lack of balance and a blurred sense of values, for those who still have some. Then, these same people who hate themselves so much are not ashamed to lecture about Hate and to make it illegal. These same people, who place their identity below everything else, accuse us to place it above those not of our kind. These same people blame us for being « closed » to the world, when they themselves have closed their mind to what they are.
The modern nationalist cause is a rather sad fight : we don’t even have worthy enemies...
Art Driseoc