The Enigma of Hitler
by Leon Degrelle
|
Leon Degrelle
Knight's Cross Holder SS-Sturmbannführer
Lèon Degrelle, Commander of the Wallonie Division, 1943 - 45
Leon Degrelle poses with his wife
and four of his seven daughters. At the end of the war, Degrelle’s children
(including his youngest child, his son) were seized by the Allied victors
and separated from one another and given different names. But through a
network of friends and supporters throughout Europe, Degrelle was able
to reunite his family in exile in Spain. |
Approximately two hundred thousand
books have dealt with the Second World War and with its central figure,
Adolf Hitler. But has the real Hitler been discovered by any of them?
"The enigma of Hitler is beyond all human comprehension," the left-wing
German weekly 'Die Zeit' once put it.
Like Pavlov's Bell
The mountains of Hitler books based
on blink hatred and ignorance do little to describe or explain the most
powerful man the world has ever seen. How, I ponder, do these thousands
of disparate portraits of Hitler in any way resemble the man I knew?
The Hitler seated beside me, standing up, talking, listening. It
has become impossible to explain to people fed fantastic tales for decades
that what they have read or heard on television just does not correspond
to the truth.
People have come to accept fiction,
repeated a thousand times over, as reality. Yet they have never seen
Hitler, never spoken to him, never heard a word from his mouth. The
very name of Hitler immediately conjures up a grimacing devil, the fount
of all of one's negative emotions. Like Pavlov's bell, the mention
of Hitler is meant to dispense with substance and reality. In time,
however, history will demand more than these summary judgements.
Strangely Attractive
Hitler is always present before
my eyes: as a man of peace in 1936, as a man of war in 1944.
It is not possible to have been a personal witness to the life of such
an extraordinary man without being marked by it forever. Not a day
goes by but Hitler rises again in my memory, not as a man long dead, but
as a real being who paces his office floor, seats himself in his chair,
pokes the burning logs in the fireplace.
The first thing anyone noticed when
he came into view was his small mustache. Countless times he had
been advised to shave it off, but he always refused: people were
used to him the way he was.
He was not tall -- no more than was
Napoleon or Alexander the Great.
Hitler had deep blue eyes that many
found bewitching, although I did not find them so. Nor did I detect
the electric current his hands were said to give off. I gripped them
quite a few times and was never struck by his lightening.
His face showed emotion or indifference
according to the passion or apathy of the moment. At times he was
as though benumbed, saying not a word, while his jaws moved in the meanwhile
as if they were grinding an obstacle to smithereens in the void.
Then he would come suddenly alive and launch into a speech directed at
you alone, as though he were addressing a crowd of hundreds of thousands
at Berlin's Tempelhof airfield. Then he became as if transfigured.
Even his complexion, otherwise dull, lit up as he spoke. And at such
times, to be sure, Hitler was strangely attractive and as if possessed
of magic powers.
Exceptional Vigor
Anything that might have seemed
too solemn in his remarks, he quickly tempered with a touch of humour.
The picturesque world, the biting phrase were at his command. In
a flash he would paint a word-picture that brought a smile, or come up
with an unexpected and disarming comparison. He could be harsh and
even implacable in his judgements and yet almost at the same time be surprisingly
conciliatory, sensitive and warm.
After
1945 Hitler was accused of every cruelty, but it was not in his nature
to be cruel. He loved children. It was an entirely natural
thing for him to stop his car and share his food with young cyclists along
the road. Once he gave his raincoat to a derelict plodding in the
rain. At midnight he would interrupt his work and prepare the food
for his dog Blondi.
He could not bear to eat meat, because
it meant the death of a living creature. He refused to have so much
as a rabbit or a trout sacrificed to provide his food. He would allow
only eggs on his table, because egg laying meant that the hen had been
spared rather than killed.
Hitler's eating habits were a constant
source of amazement to me. How could someone on such a rigorous schedule,
who had taken part in tens of thousands of exhausting mass meetings from
which he emerged bathed with sweat, often losing two to four pounds in
the process; who slept only three to four hours a night; and
who, from 1940 to 1945, carried the whole world on his shoulders while
ruling over 380 million Europeans: how, I wondered, could he physically
survive on just a boiled egg, a few tomatoes, two or three pancakes, and
a plate of noodles? But he actually gained weight!
He drank only water. He did
not smoke and would not tolerate smoking in his presence. At one
or two o'clock in the morning he would still be talking, untroubled, close
to his fireplace, lively, often amusing. He never showed any sign of weariness.
Dead tired his audience might be, but not Hitler.
He was depicted as a tired old man.
Nothing was further from the truth. In September 1944, when he was
reported to be fairly doddering, I spent a week with him. His mental
and physical vigor were still exceptional. The attempt made on his
life on July 20th had, if anything, recharged him. He took tea in
his quarters as tranquilly as if we had been in his small private apartment
at the chancellery before the war, or enjoying the view of snow and bright
blue sky through his great bay window at Berchtesgaden.
Iron Self-Control
At the very end of his life, to
be sure, his back had become bent, but his mind remained as clear as a
flash of lightening. The testament he dictated with extraordinary
composure on the eve of his death, at three in the morning of April 29,
1945, provides us a lasting testimony. Napoleon at Fontainebleau
was not without his moments of panic before his abdication. Hitler
simply shook hands with his associates in silence, breakfasted as on any
other day, then went to his death as if he were going on a stroll.
When has history ever witnessed so enormous a tragedy brought to its end
with such iron self control?
Hitler's
most notable characteristic was ever his simplicity. The most complex
of problems resolved itself in his mind into a few basic principles.
His actions were geared to ideas and decisions that could be understood
by anyone. The laborer from Essen, the isolated farmer, the Ruhr
industrialist, and the university professor could all easily follow his
line of thought. The very clarity of his reasoning made everything
obvious.
His behaviour and his life style
never changed even when he became the ruler of Germany. He dressed
and lived frugally. During his early days in Munich, he spend no
more than a mark per day for food. At no stage in his life did he
spend anything on himself. Throughout his 13 years in the chancellery
he never carried a wallet or ever had money of his own.
Computer-Like Mind
Hitler
was self-taught and made not attempt to hide the fact. The smug conceit
of intellectuals, their shiny ideas packaged like so many flashlight batteries,
irritated him at times. His own knowledge he had acquired through
selective and unremitting study, and he knew far more than thousands of
diploma-decorated academics. I don't think anyone ever read as much as
he did. He normally read one book every day, always first reading
the conclusion and the index in order to gauge the work's interest for
him. He had the power to extract the essence of each book and then
store it in his computer-like mind. I have heard him talk about complicated
scientific books with faultless precision, even at the height of the war.

His intellectual curiosity was limitless.
He was readily familiar with the writings of the most diverse authors,
and nothing was too complex for his comprehension. He had a deep
knowledge and understanding of Buddha, Confucius and Jesus Christ, as well
as Luther, Calvin, and Savonarola; of literary giants such as Dante,
Schiller, Shakespeare and Goethe; and analytical writers such as
Renan and Gobineau, Chamberlain and Sorel.
He had trained himself in philosophy
by studying Aristotle and Plato. He could quote entire paragraphs of Schopenhauer
from memory, and for a long time carried a pocked edition of Schopenhauer
with him. Nietzsche taught him much about the willpower.
His
thirst for knowledge was unquenchable. He spend hundreds of hours
studying the works of Tacitus and Mommsen, military strategists such as
Clausewitz, and empire builders such as Bismark. Nothing escaped
him: world history or the history of civilizations, the study of
the Bible and the Talmud, Thomistic philosophy and all the masterpieces
of Homer, Sophocles, Horace, Ovid, Titus Livius and Cicero. He knew
Julian the Apostate as if he had been his contemporary.
His knowledge also extended to mechanics.
He knew how engines worked; he understood the ballistics of various weapons;
and he astonished the best medical scientists with his knowledge of medicine
and biology.
The universality of Hitler's knowledge
may surprise or displease those unaware of it, but it is nonetheless a
historical fact: Hitler was one of the most cultivated men of this
century. Many times more so than Churchill, an intellectual mediocrity;
or than Pierre Lavaal, with him mere cursory knowledge of history;
of than Roosevelt; or Eisenhower, who never got beyond detective
novels.
The Young Architect
Even during his earliest years,
Hitler was different than other children. He had an inner strength
and was guided by his spirit and his instincts.
He could draw skillfully when he
was only eleven years old. His sketches made at that age show a remarkable
firmness and liveliness. He first paintings and watercolors, created at
age 15, are full of poetry and sensitivity. One of his most striking
early works, Fortress Utopia,' also shows him to have been an artist of
rare imagination. His artistic orientation took many forms.
He wrote poetry from the time he was a lad. He dictated a complete
play to his sister Paula who was amazed at his presumption. At the age
of 16, in Vienna, he launched into the creation of an opera. He even
designed the stage settings, as well as all the costumes; and, of
course, the characters were Wagnerian heroes.
More than just an artist, Hitler
was above all an architect. Hundreds of his works were notable as
much for the architecture as for the painting. From memory alone
he could reproduce in every detail the onion dome of a church or the intricate
curves of wrought iron. Indeed, it was to fulfill his dream of becoming
an architect that Hitler went to Vienna at the beginning of the century.
When
one sees the hundreds of paintings, sketches and drawings he created at
the time, which reveal his mastery of three dimensional figures, it is
astounding that his examiners at the Fine Arts Academy failed him in two
successive examinations. German historian Werner Maser, no friend
of Hitler, castigated these examiners: "All of his works revealed
extraordinary architectural gifts and knowledge. The builder of the
Third Reich gives the former Fine Arts Academy of Vienna cause for shame."
In his room, Hitler always displayed
an old photograph of his mother. The memory of the mother he loved was
with him until the day he died. Before leaving this earth, on April 30,
1945, he placed his mother's photograph in front of him. She had
blue eyes like his and a similar face. Her maternal intuition told
her that her son was different from other children. She acted almost
as if she knew her son's destiny. When she died, she felt anguished by
the immense mystery surrounding her son.
Humble Origins
Throughout the years of his youth,
Hitler lived the life of a virtual recluse. He greatest wish was
to withdraw from the world. At heart a loner, he wandered about,
ate meager meals, but devoured the books of three public libraries.
He abstained from conversations and had few friends.
It
is almost impossible to imagine another such destiny where a man started
with so little and reached such heights. Alexander the great was
the son of a king. Napoleon, from a well-to-do family, was a general
at 24. Fifteen years after Vienna, Hitler would still be an unknown
corporal. Thousands of others had a thousand times more opportunity
to leave their mark on the world.
Hitler was not much concerned with
his private life. In Vienna he had lived in shabby, cramped lodgings.
But for all that he rented a piano that took up half his room, and concentrated
on composing his opera. He lived on bread, milk, and vegetable soup.
His poverty was real. He did not even own an over-coat. He shoveled
streets on snowy days. He carried luggage at the railway station.
He spent many weeks in shelters for the homeless. But he never stopped
painting or reading.
Despite his dire poverty, Hitler
somehow managed to maintain a clean appearance. Landlords and landladies
in Vienna and Munich all remembered him for his civility and pleasant disposition.
His behaviour was impeccable. His room was always spotless, his meager
belongings meticulously arranged, and his clothes neatly hung or folded.
He washed and ironed his own clothes, something which in those days few
men did. He needed almost nothing to survive, and money from the
sale of a few paintings was sufficient to provide for all his needs.
Search For Destiny
Impressed by the beauty of the church
in a Benedictine monastery where he was part of the choir and served as
an altar boy, Hitler dreamt fleetingly of becoming a Benedictine monk.
And it was at that time, too, interestingly enough, that whenever he attended
mass, he always had to pass beneath the first swastika he had ever seen:
it was graven in the stone escutcheon of the abbey portal.
Hitler's father, a customs officer,
hoped the boy would follow in his footsteps and become a civil servant.
His tutor encouraged him to become a monk. Instead the young Hitler
went, or rather fled, to Vienna. And there, thwarted in his artistic
aspirations by the bureaucratic mediocrities of academia, he turned to
isolation and meditation. Lost in the great capital of Austria-Hungary,
he searched for his destiny.
During the first 30 years of Hitler's
life, the date April 20, 1889, meant nothing to anyone. He was born
on that day in Braunau, a small town in the Inn valley. During his
exile in Vienna, he often thought of his modest home, and particularly
of his mother. When she fell ill, he returned home from Vienna to
look after her. For weeks he nursed her, did all the household chores,
and supported her as the most loving of sons. When she finally died,
on Christmas eve, his pain was immense. Wracked with grief, he buried
his mother in the little country cemetary. "I have never seen anyone
so prostrate with grief," said his mother's doctor, who happened to be
Jewish.
A Strong Soul
Hitler had not yet focused on politics,
but without his rightly knowing, that was the career to which he was most
strongly called. Politics would ultimately blend with his passion for art.
People, the masses, would be the clay the sculptor shapes into an immortal
form. The human clay would become for him a beautiful work of art like
one of Myron's marble sculptures, a Hans Makart painting, or Wagner's Ring
Trilogy.
His
love of music, art and architecture had not removed him from the political
life and social concerns of Vienna. In order to survive, he worked
as a common laborer sided by side with other workers. He was a silent
spectator, but nothing escaped him: not the vanity and egoism of
the bourgeoisie, not the moral and material misery of the people, nor yet
the hundreds of thousands of workers who surged down the wide avenues of
Vienna with anger in their hearts.
He had also been taken aback by the
growing presence in Vienna of bearded Jews wearing caftans, a sight unknown
in Linz. "How can they be Germans?" he asked himself. He read
the statistics: in 1860 there were 69 Jewish families in Vienna;
40 years later there were 200,000. They were everywhere. He observed
their invasion of the universities and the legal and medical professions,
and their takeover of the newspapers.
Hitler was exposed to the passionate
reactions of the workers to this influx, but the workers were not alone
in their unhappiness. There were many prominent persons in Austria
and Hungary who did not hide their resentment at what they believed was
an alien invasion of their country. The mayor of Vienna, a Christian-Democrat
and a powerful orator, was eagerly listened to by Hitler.
Hitler was also concerned with the
fate of the eight million Austrian Germans kept apart from Germany, and
thus deprived of their rightful German nationhood. He saw Emperor
Franz Josef as a bitter and petty old man unable to cope with the problems
of the day and the aspirations of the future.
Quietly, the young Hitler was summing
things up in his mind.
First: Austrians were part
of Germany, the common fatherland.
Second: The Jews were aliens
within the German community.
Third: Patriotism was only
valid if it was shared by all classes. The common people with whom Hitler
had shared grief and humiliation were just as much a part of the fatherland
as the millionaires of high society.
Fourth: Class war would sooner
or later condemn both workers and bosses to ruin in any country.
No country could survive class war; only cooperation between workers and
bosses can benefit the country. Workers must be respected and live with
decency and honor. Creativity must never be stifled.
When Hitler later said that he had
formed his social and political doctrine in Vienna, he told the truth.
Ten years later his observations made in Vienna would become the order
of the day.
Thus Hitler was to live for several
years in the crowded city of Vienna as a virtual outcast, yet quietly observing
everything around him. His strength came from within. He did
not rely on anyone to do his thinking for him. Exceptional human
beings always feel lonely amid the vast human throng. Hitler saw
his solitude as a wonderful opportunity to meditate and not to be submerged
in a mindless sea. In order not to be lost in the wastes of a sterile
desert, a strong soul seeks refuge within himself. Hitler was such
a soul.
The Word
The lightning in Hitler's life would
come from the word.
All his artistic talent would be
channeled into his mastery of communication and eloquence. Hitler
would never conceive of popular conquests without the power of the word.
He would enchant and be enchanted by it. He would find total fulfillment
when the magic of his words inspired the hearts and minds of the masses
with whom he communed.
He would feel reborn each time he
conveyed with mystical beauty the knowledge he had acquired in his lifetime.
Hitler's incantory eloquence will
remain, for a very long time, a vast field of study for the psychoanalyst.
The power of Hitler's word is the key. Without it, there would never
have been a Hitler era.
Transcendant Faith
Did Hitler believe in God?
He
believed deeply in God. He called God the Almighty, master of all
that is known and unknown.
Propagandists portrayed Hitler as
an atheist. He was not. He had contempt for hypocritical and
materialistic clerics, but he was not alone in that. He believed
in the necessity of standards and theological dogmas, without which, he
repeatedly said, the great institution of the Christian church would collapse.
These dogmas clashed with his intelligence, but he also recognized that
it was hard for the human mind to encompass all the problems of creation,
its limitless scope and breathtaking beauty. He acknowledged that
every human being has spiritual needs.
The song of the nightingale, the
pattern and color of a flower, continually brought him back to the great
problems of creation. No one in the world has spoken to me so eloquently
about the existence of God. He held this view not because he was
brought up as a Christian, but because his analytical mind bound him to
the concept of God.
Hitler's faith transcended formulas
and contingencies. God was for him the basis of everything, the ordainer
of all things, of his Destiny and that of all others.
***
The Measure of Greatness
by Dr William L. Pierce,
Head of the National Alliance
and author of The Turner Diaries, and Hunter.
NATIONAL VANGUARD Editorial from
1989
April 20 of this year is the 100th
anniversary of the birth of the greatest man of our era -- a man who dared
more and achieved more, who set his aim higher and climbed higher, who
felt more deeply and stirred the souls of those around him more mightily,
who was more closely attuned to the Life Force which permeates our cosmos
and gives it meaning and purpose, and did more to serve that Life Force,
than any other man of our times.
And yet he is the most reviled and
hated man of our times. Only a few tens of thousands of men and women,
in scattered groups around the world, will celebrate his birthday with
love and reverence on April 20, while all of the scribblers and commentators
of the controlled news media, the controlled politicians, and the controlled
churchmen will pour out their hatred and venom and lies against him, and
those lies will be believed by hundreds of millions.
What is the measure of greatness
in a man?
Only the most vulgar and doctrinaire
democrat would seriously equate greatness with popularity -- although in
any polling of average citizens on their choice for the greatest man of
the century there are certain to be substantial numbers of votes for Elvis
Presley, John Kennedy, Billy Graham, Michael Jackson, and various other
high-visibility lightweights: charismatic entertainers on the stage of
politics, rock concerts, spectator sports, or what have you.
More serious citizens would pass
by the lightweights and choose men who have changed the world in some way.
We would hear choices like Franklin Roosevelt ("he saved the world from
fascism"), Albert Einstein ("he taught us about the nature of our universe"),
and Martin Luther King ("he helped us achieve racial justice"), depending
upon whether one's personal inclinations lay more in the direction of politics,
science, or racial self-abasement, respectively.
But if the poll asked instead for the
most evil man of the century, or the most hated man, or the man having
the most negative influence, at least three-quarters of the blue-collar
and the white-collar pollees alike would name one man: Adolf Hitler. This,
however, would be merely a reflection of the role assigned to him by the
controlled mass media, rather than a truly informed and reasoned choice.
All of this raises several very interesting
issues. There is, for example, the question of how we came to the preposterous
state of affairs prevailing today, wherein we place the destiny of our
nation, our planet, and our race in the hands of a mass of voters whose
powers of judgment are manifested in such things as the type of television
entertainment their preferences have pushed into prime time and the type
of men they have elected to public office. And there is the equally weighty
question of how, knowing the ease with which this mass is misled, we permitted
virtually all of the media of mass information and entertainment to fall
into the hands of a race whose interests are so diametrically opposed to
our own.
Perhaps even more pertinent to a
consideration of human greatness, however, is the question of how our system
of values came to be turned on its head, so that Franklin Roosevelt is
regarded as a hero and Adolf Hitler as a villain, not only by the stolid
and stunned masses, but also by a majority of the supposedly "educated"
elite, many of whom pride themselves on their intellectual independence.
Whether we judge the greatness of
a man by his intrinsic qualities of character and soul or by his accomplishments,
Adolf Hitler had greatness of a very high order -- if we use the standards
which have been traditional in our race.
We cannot, of course, make comparisons
with all the "mute, inglorious Miltons" whose lack of notable accomplishment
has made them anonymous, despite the sterling inner qualities they may
have possessed. But when Hitler's character is held up beside those of
other 20th-century political leaders, he stands as a giant among pygmies.
At the prosaic level, we can note
his ascetic personal habits, compared with Winston Churchill's habitual
drunkenness and noto-rious self-indulgence; or his personal loyalty to
those who had been his comrades in the days of political struggle, compared
with Joseph Stalin's habit of murdering his former comrades by the dozen,
as potential rivals, as soon as he no longer needed their services; or
his direct, frank, and straightforward manner, compared to the cunning
deviousness which was Franklin Roosevelt's trademark. At
the spiritual level, the inner differences between Hitler and his contemporaries
are even more striking. Hitler was a man with a mission, from the beginning.
The testimony of his closest associates, from his boyhood days to the end
of his life, agrees with the observations of more distant and impartial
observers: Hitler had a mystical sense of destiny, a sense of having been
singled out and called by a higher power to devote his life to the service
of his race.
His childhood companion August Kubizek
has related extraordinary evidence of this when Hitler was only 16 years
old.(August Kubizek, Adolf Hitler, mein Jugendfreund (Graz, 1953), pp.
127-135). Twenty years later, while he was in prison after an unsuccessful
attempt to overthrow the government, Hitler himself wrote of his motivation
in a way which suggested the range of his vision:
"What we must fight for is the security
of the existence and reproduction of our race and our people, the sustenance
of our children and themaintenance of the purity of our blood . . . so
that our people may mature for the fulfillment of the mission allotted
them by the Creator of the universe."
Every thought and every idea, every
doctrine and all knowledge, must serve this purpose. And everything must
be examined from this point of view and used or rejected according to its
utility. Then no theory will stiffen into a dead doctrine, since it is
life alone that all things must serve. . . .
. . . The National Socialist philosophy
finds the importance of mankind in its basic racial elements. In the state
it sees on principle a means to an end and construes that end as the preservation
of the racial existence of man. . . .
And so the National Socialist philosophy
of life corresponds to the innermost will of Nature, since it restores
that free play of forces which must lead to a continuous mutual higher
breeding, until finally the best of humanity, having achieved possession
of this earth, will have a free play for activity in domains which will
lie partly above it and partly outside it.
We all sense that in the distant
future humanity must be faced by problems which only a highest race, become
mas-ter people and supported by the means and possibilities of an entire
globe, will be equipped to overcome. . . .
Thus, the highest purpose of a National
Socialist state is concern for the preservation of those original racial
elements which bestow culture and create the beauty and dignity of a higher
mankind. We, as Aryans, can conceive of the state only as the living organism
of a nationality which not only assures the preservation of this nationality,
but by the development of its spiritual and ideal abilities leads it to
the highest freedom. . . .
A National Socialist state must begin
by raising marriage from the level of a continuous defilement of the race
and give it the consecration of an institution which is called upon to
produce images of the Lord and not monstrosities halfway between man and
ape. . . .
It must set race in the center of
all life. It must take care to keep it pure. It must declare the child
to be the most precious treasure of the people. It must see to it that
only the healthy beget children . . . .
The National Socialist state must
make certain that by a suitable education of youth it will someday obtain
a race ripe for the last and greatest decisions on this earth. . . .
. . .Anyone who wants to cure this
era, which is inwardly sick and rotten, must first summon the courage to
make clear the causes of this disease. And this should be the concern of
the National Socialist movement: pushing aside all narrowmindedness, to
gather and to organize from the ranks of our nation those forces capable
of becoming the vanguard fighters for a new philosophy of life. . . .
We are not simple enough to believe
that it could ever be possible to bring about a perfect era. But this relieves
no one of the obligation to combat recognized errors, to overcome weaknesses,
and to strive for the ideal. Harsh reality of its own accord will create
only too many limitations. For that very reason, however, man must try
to serve the ultimate goal, and failures must not deter him, any more than
he can abandon a system of justice because mistakes creep into it, or any
more than medicine is discarded because there always will be sickness in
spite of it.
We National Socialists know that
with this conception we stand as revolu-tionaries in the world of today
and are branded as such. But our thoughts and actions must in no way be
determined by the approval or disapproval of our time, but by the binding
obligation to a truth which we have recognized."(Adolf Hitler, Mein Kampf)
Hitler's opponents, Churchill and
Roosevelt, were party politicians, with the minds and souls of party politicians.
Great, impersonal goals, just as truth, meant nothing at all to them. The
only thing that counted was the approval or disapproval of their times:
the outcome of the next election, a good press claque, votes. Only Stalin
shared in any way Hitler's disdain for approval; only Stalin was motivated
to any degree by an impersonal idea. But the idea that Stalin served was
the alien, destructive idea of Jewish Marxism. And while Hitler served
the Life Force with the instincts of a seer, Stalin served Marxism with
the instincts of a bureaucrat and a butcher.
A comparison of careers leads us
to a similar ranking of greatness of soul. Churchill and Roosevelt were
born into the political establishment. They fed at the public trough for
years, in one office after another, grabbing greedily at opportunities
for a bigger serving of swill. But it was circumstance, not their own efforts,
which thrust them onto the stage of world history.
Stalin hacked out his own niche in
history to a much greater extent than his western allies, and he was an
incomparably stronger man than either of them. He was tough, ruthless,
infinitely cunning, and utterly determined to prevail, no matter what the
obstacles. Even so, his struggle for prominence and power was entirely
within the Bolshevik party and its predecessors. He was the consummate
bureaucratic infighter, not the innovator or the lone pioneer.
Only
Adolf Hitler started literally from nothing and through the exercise of
a superhuman will created the physical basis for the realization of his
vision. In 1918, recovering from a British poison-gas attack in a veterans'
hospital, he made the decision to enter politics in order to serve that
vision. He was a 29-year-old invalid, with no money, no family, no friends
or connections, no university education, and no experience. Liberals, Jews,
and communists ruled his country, making him and all those to whom he might
appeal for support outsiders.
Five and one-half years later he
was sentenced to five years in prison for his political activity, and his
enemies thought that was the end of him and his movement. But less than
nine years after being sentenced he was Chancellor of Germany, with the
strongest and most progressive nation in Europe at his command. He had
built the National Socialist movement and led it to victory over the organized
opposition of the entire Establishment: conservatives, liberals, communists,
Jews, and Christians.
He then transformed Germany, lifting
it out of its economic depression (while Americans, under Roosevelt, continued
to line up at the soup kitchens), restoring its spirit (and much of the
territory which had been taken from it by the victors of the First World
War), stimulating its artistic and scientific creativity, and winning the
admiration (or, in some cases, the envy and hatred) of other nations. It
was an achievement hardly paralleled in the history of the world. Even
those who do not understand the real significance of his creation must
concede that.
And what was the real significance
of Hitler's work? One of his most earnest admirers in India, Savitri Devi,
has given us a poetic answer to that question. She wrote:
". . . [I]n its essence, the National
Socialist idea exceeds not only Germany and our times, but the Aryan race
and mankind itself and any epoch; . . . it ultimately expresses that mysterious
and unfailing wisdom according to which Nature lives and creates: the impersonal
wisdom of the primeval forest and of the ocean depth and of the spheres
in the dark fields of space; and .. . it is Adolf Hitler's glory not merely
to have gone back to that divine wisdom -- stigmatizing man's silly infatuation
for "intellect," his childish pride in "progress," and his criminal attempt
to enslave Nature -- but to have made it the basis of a practical regeneration
policy of worldwide scope, precisely now, in our overcrowded, overcivilized,
and technically overevolved world, at the very end of the dark age."(Savitri
Devi, The Lightning and the Sun (National Socialist World No. 1, p. 61))
More prosaically, Hitler's work,
in contrast to that of his contemporaries, was above politics, above economics,
above nationalism. He had mobilized a powerful, modern state and placed
it at the service of our race, so that our race might become fit to serve
as an agent of the Life Force.
Perceptive and idealistic young men
from every nation in Europe -- and from many nations outside Europe as
well -- recognized this significance, and they flocked to serve him and
to fight for his cause, even at the cost of censure and ostracism from
their more parochial and narrowminded countrymen. There was never before
an elite fighting force to match the SS, which by the end of the Second
World War had more non-Germans than Germans in it.
The war, of course, is counted as
Hitler's great failure, even as the proof of his lack of greatness, by
his detractors. It merely proves that he was a man, not a god, even if
a divine will worked through him, and that he could not perform miracles.
He could not defend himself forever, with the governments of nearly the
whole world allied in a total war to pull him down and destroy his creation,
so that they and the interests they served could return to "business as
usual." Even so, he gave a far better account of himself than any of his
adversaries.
And what will count in the long run
in determining Adolf Hitler's stature is not whether he lost or won the
war, but whether it was he or his adversaries who were on the side of the
Life Force, whether it was he or they who served the cause of Truth and
human progress. We only have to look around us today to know it was not
they.
|